More oiks at Oxford

三月 21, 2003

So the university access regulator has been set up to leaven the effete gene pool of Hooray Henries and Henriettas in our top universities with the odd bit of rough. Who cares?

Those who've spent good money buying their kids academic privilege for a start, not to mention our journalistic elite and academics already exercised over new ways to measure "potential".

Recent education policies have been hostile to inclusion. They've made the exam rat race start sooner in schools. While starving them of funds, they've disparaged the academic credentials of post-92 universities responsible for huge strides towards the access target. They've put disincentives in the way of the excluded to lessen demand for university places, while taking the cap off recruitment in pre-92 universities undermines the viability of all but the most utilitarian courses in post-92 institutions. They've cut funding and delegitimised research in post-92 universities in the white paper.

The clear intention is to reinforce the "binary divide" between former polytechnics and pre-92 universities and to defeat the access project. This is aided by a failure to see that "Access = our getting another 10 per cent of the age cohort into university" is quite distinct from "Access = oiks at Oxford".

Roger Harris
Formerly campus dean of students
Middlesex University

Please login or register to read this article.

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments