Letter: All above board 2

十一月 30, 2001

The University of Glasgow research project was approved by the department of sociology and the faculty of social sciences on the grounds that it was opening an important area of research.

In response to Marcello Mega's initial inquiry, it was explained that in any area of investigation, researchers need to be able to report on processes or situations and to develop scientifically grounded explanations. Given that humans have a wide range of sexual preferences and can follow these in situations where they may be regarded as immoral or illegal, sociological research cannot be restricted to practices or communities that society in general may regard as "normal".

Following further information from Mega, the university promptly began an inquiry. It found that the researcher concerned had not breached the university's code of discipline or the regulations and code of conduct for using IT facilities. He was, however, told to modify his research methods with respect to the conduct of interviews. The sociology department was requested to take appropriate action with regard to its supervision of the work.

The press office handled the information, as provided by Mega, in the professional manner necessary to provide the response he requested. If Mega believes he has evidence that a member of the university misused that information, any such complaint would be investigated.

Dugald Mackie
Secretary of court
University of Glasgow


Log in or register to post comments


Like the rest of society, universities have largely failed to consider the specific needs of menopausal women. Here, one scholar describes how this can lead to marginalisation and bullying – and why the issue is as important as the fight for maternity rights

1月 16日

在反专家民粹主义盛行的时代,捍卫科学真理比以往任何时候都更为重要,但也更困难,易招致人身攻击。安娜·麦基(Anna McKie)的这篇文章写给那些为科学倡议而付出高昂代价的人、以及那些愿意承担起这个事业的人

1月 16日