Insular arguments

十一月 21, 2003

Alison Wolf (Columnist, THES , November 14) paints a dismal but familiar picture of UK higher education and its inherent parochialism.

Only one sentence in the entire article mentions the benefits (to "our own students and academics") of the net influx of European Union students to the UK. If the UK sends fewer students than it receives, that is a comment on the educational system we run in the UK and its deficiencies in preparing non-linguists for sojourns abroad, not a valid criticism of the Erasmus and Socrates programmes.

Nothing further is said about the contribution that these students might make to classes; about the value of having postgraduate students who have come from other systems, and who may well come here because they came here as undergraduates; about the strikingly high calibre of (other) EU postdoctoral staff; about the hope that some of us have that staff appointed from, frankly, better university systems than our own might belatedly help raise the standard of UK research so that it becomes genuinely "internationally excellent".

None of these clear academic benefits of maximising EU student intake is allowed to intrude on a depressingly mercantile and short-term argument.

Which says it all, really.

D. A. Trotter
University of Wales Aberystwyth

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.