High stakes

March 10, 2011

Times Higher Education's fine piece about the recent Cambridge conference The Arts and Humanities: Endangered Species? is inevitably selective about what was an extremely rich, diverse and wide-ranging set of discussions ("Reforms may turn scholars into academic 'lap dancers'?", 3 March). These included how far "arts and humanities" as nomenclature now designates and has become synonymous with "education" itself, with any defence of the one dependent on fighting for the other.

Whether we can protect the "democratic freedom of the humanities" is about a set of educational values - humanist, critically informed, egalitarian and inclusive - in relation to which the future of women's education and the new universities particularly are at risk. What is ultimately at stake, however, unless the sector can unite around a political strategy to prevent disastrous access policies and social division, is the integrity of the UK's post-school education in its entirety.

Julia Swindells, Professor of English, Anglia Ruskin University

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October