Democratic debate 2

十二月 7, 2007

Angry demonstrators have shown contempt for the sanctity of academic freedom. Nick Griffin and David Irving must be allowed to express their opinions, no matter what they are, and Oxford University, which prides itself in cultivating diversity and a harmonious environment, should have acted to safeguard the inalienable right to free expression. Why then should we protest the sentencing of a British schoolteacher in Khartoum for naming a teddy bear Muhammad? Why should we protest against the military junta in Burma for its transgressions of human rights? Why should we protest against General Pervez Musharraf's grip on power and the detention of journalists, lawyers, judges and human rights advocates? As Ronald Reagan eloquently put it: "It is the march of freedom and democracy which will leave Marxism-Leninism on the ash heap of history as it has left other tyrannies that stifle freedom and muzzle the self-expression of the people."

Munjed Farid Al Qutob, London SW5.

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.