Democratic debate 2

December 7, 2007

Angry demonstrators have shown contempt for the sanctity of academic freedom. Nick Griffin and David Irving must be allowed to express their opinions, no matter what they are, and Oxford University, which prides itself in cultivating diversity and a harmonious environment, should have acted to safeguard the inalienable right to free expression. Why then should we protest the sentencing of a British schoolteacher in Khartoum for naming a teddy bear Muhammad? Why should we protest against the military junta in Burma for its transgressions of human rights? Why should we protest against General Pervez Musharraf's grip on power and the detention of journalists, lawyers, judges and human rights advocates? As Ronald Reagan eloquently put it: "It is the march of freedom and democracy which will leave Marxism-Leninism on the ash heap of history as it has left other tyrannies that stifle freedom and muzzle the self-expression of the people."

Munjed Farid Al Qutob, London SW5.

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October