Corrosive impact merits only dismissal (2 of 2)

四月 14, 2011

So the Arts and Humanities Research Council claims to have voluntarily added the "Big Society" to its research themes ("Delete 'Big Society': email protest presses AHRC to drop Tory mantra", 7 April). That illustrates the danger with taking the government's money. It can lead to taking the government seriously.

But the role of academia is precisely not to take too seriously the kind of government we must now expect. If a guffaw of derisive dismissal doesn't go up from academe when callow nonsense such as the Big Society is proposed for public attention, where will it go up from? Civil society? - too compromised, in so far as it actually exists. The media? - largely trivialised where not simply prostituted. The opposition? - too obviously grinding axes (and in any case, we all remember the Third Way).

With our politicians so laughable, academia must discharge its vital role as the intellectual conscience of the nation by actually and audibly laughing.

John Foster, Cumbria

Please login or register to read this article.

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments