Class divisions 3

August 24, 2007

Dr Chav's account of the snobbery of academia towards the white working class contains cultural imperialism of its own: crowning the "chav" as the defining icon of working-class culture.

Nearly 20 years ago, journalist Tony Parsons lamented that the Thatcher years had not just damaged working-class life, it had also wrecked its culture: the decent trade unionist being sidelined by the fat shell-suited lager lout. A Marxist might see this as the rise of the lumpenproletariat, historically the ally of fascism and strike-breaking. Dr Chav must not be surprised if what remains of the Left, proletarian or professional class, is unimpressed by lager louts, chavs and other impostors masquerading as true working class.

Emma Knightley

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。




  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论


Log in or register to post comments


Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October