Cancer’s causes neglected

May 22, 2014

You report that cancer survival rates and expenditure on cancer research in the UK are both rising (“Survival rates up. Funding up. Hopes up”, Research Intelligence, 8 May), but fail to mention that the incidence of cancer has also risen – by 3 per cent in men and 7 per cent in women between 2000-02 and 2009‑11 (Cancer Research UK data, 2014).

So it is all the more surprising that expenditure on research into prevention represents only 3.6 per cent of total cancer research expenditure in the UK, while research on the causes of cancer has actually fallen, from 16.4 per cent to 9.2 per cent of the total between 2002 and 2011 (National Cancer Research Institute data). Within this figure, the steepest fall is in research into “exogenous factors in the origin and cause of cancer”, that is, environmental and occupational exposures. Research into the causes and prevention of cancer forms just a minor part of CRUK’s new research strategy, with no mention of research into potential causes such as pesticides and other chemical agents.

If prevention is better than cure, which in the case of cancer is surely true, are we getting our priorities right?

Paul Probyn
Cockfosters

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

赞助