'Bad' scientist

四月 29, 2010

David Colquhoun has succeeded through scare tactics in getting the University of Buckingham Medical School to withdraw from the diploma in the study of integrated medicine (IM) (“It’s terminal for integrated medicine diploma”, 15 April).

Colquhoun operates in the name of “good science” and the “protection of patients”, but does not represent any patient group. He is a pharmacologist, not a physician.

His “bad science” argument is flawed: he cannot say that there is not enough good science to justify the practice of IM and then attempt to ban its study from UK universities.

His attempts to inhibit the academic study of IM are undemocratic, antisocial and stem from pure prejudice. If he were interested in improving the science of IM, he would have welcomed this initiative.

Rosy Daniel, Diploma course leader, Integrated Health Trust.

Please login or register to read this article.

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments