Access issues 2

二月 11, 2005

The Higher Education Funding Council for England report on participation is old, false, trivial and unethical (Access supplement, January 21).

We already knew that participation varies with time, geography, socioeconomic factors, seasons, sex, school type and public examination. This report claims to add information but ignores change over time. As most of the sources of variation in participation are ignored, nothing useful is added, not even objective information on the accuracy of the estimates. If these statistics are regarded as government statistics, then Sir Martin Harris should consider asking the Statistics Commission to investigate why the required standards, which include giving confidence intervals for the main results, have not been met.

Jane Hutton
Warwick University

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多