Leader: Premium concerns

March 5, 2004

Those who prefer evidence to crystal ball-gazing in assessing the likely pattern of top-up fees in England should be keeping a close eye on events in Australia, where universities will be able to charge up to 25 per cent more for their courses from next year. The Russell Group equivalents (the Group of Eight research universities) are expected to charge the maximum in all subjects, but it had been assumed that less prestigious institutions would settle for less. Now Queensland University of Technology has alarmed and angered the government by suggesting that it might go for high fees in order to maintain prestige - a stance condemned by the education minister as "facile, ridiculous and nonsensical".

Where Queensland is leading, however, others will surely follow - in England as well as Australia. And the argument holds for subjects as well as for institutions. Fee income might be recycled as bursaries to attract students onto hard-to-fill courses, but academics and administrators will be reluctant to project the image of a "cheap" subject. The promised UK inquiry into variability may have very little to examine in 2009.

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

赞助