Tocqueville: The Aristocratic Sources of Liberty by Lucien Jaume, translated by Arthur Goldhammer

Biancamaria Fontana on the influences that shaped a French aristocrat’s ambiguous view of democracy from his studies of the American model

May 16, 2013

One of the most interesting features of Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America is the author’s ambivalent attitude to the political model he so greatly assisted in popularising, through his illustration of the US example. On his account, democracy encouraged individual independence, dignity and responsibility, while the equality of citizens in democratic societies favoured sociability and solidarity. At the same time, democracy generated selfishness and materialism; it brought to power mediocre, vulgar leaders; perhaps more alarmingly, it replaced the despotism of ancien régime monarchies with a new form of tyranny, based on the opinion of the majority and a watchful social state.

Lucien Jaume addresses this ambiguity in Tocqueville’s work from an essentially French perspective, placing it in the context of the European post-revolutionary experience. Described in the original 2008 French edition as an “intellectual biography”, the book reconstructs in detail the influences that oriented and shaped Tocqueville’s thought, looking beyond obvious references such as Montesquieu or Guizot to religious traditions such as Protestantism and Jansenism and new literary and aesthetic currents.

At the beginning of his study, Jaume explains that Tocqueville’s seeming ambivalence towards his subject was to some extent a deliberate choice. He kept his distance, remaining, as it were, “behind a curtain”, so that readers might feel free to make up their own minds. Indeed, if one considers Tocqueville’s background, his restraint was quite admirable: as the heir of an aristocratic royalist family that had suffered greatly during the revolution of 1789, he would have been a natural candidate for unbending conservatism, rather than for the role of sympathetic observer of democracy. Instead he remained faithful to his origins by embracing an aristocratic tradition of support for freedom and moderation. In France, this tradition had been crushed by the authoritarian ambitions of the Bourbon monarchs, who deliberately diminished and marginalised the aristocracy. It was an attitude that would leave their hapless descendants at the end of the 18th century to face the assaults of a disaffected nation alone, without the support of a loyal nobility.

Clearly it was misguided to believe, as some nostalgic royalists did during the Restoration, that with the return of the monarchy the French aristocracy might recover its lost historical role. However, Tocqueville believed that in post-revolutionary society, something must take its place in order to protect the nation from the unrestrained power of the general will.

Published in 1835-40, Democracy in America had an almost visionary quality to it, as the representative regimes of Europe (and in different ways the US one) were far from what we would regard today as “true” democracies. Poorer men, and of course all women, were still excluded from suffrage, while government rested in the hands of the traditional ruling classes and of the new bourgeois elites. Significantly, Tocqueville did not join those conservatives who thought that the best defence against the evils of democracy was to continue excluding the great majority of citizens from government. He thought instead that new moderating forces should take on the role of mediator that had once been performed by the old aristocracy, containing and guiding popular opinion. These forces he identified in the spontaneous associations of civil society, so active in US political life, thus stressing a dimension - spontaneous citizen mobilisation - that was destined to play a crucial role in modern democracies. Although it may be a little too diffuse and intricate for the lay reader, Jaume’s book illustrates compellingly the novelty and lasting interest of Tocqueville’s contribution.

Tocqueville: The Aristocratic Sources of Liberty

By Lucien Jaume, translated by Arthur Goldhammer
Princeton University Press, 356pp, £24.95
ISBN 9780691152042
Published 30 April 2013

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham