What Youyou Tu’s Nobel prize victory means for Chinese science

China’s long wait for a home-grown Nobel prize in science is now over, but concerns over its university culture remain, says David Matthews

October 5, 2015
Mao Zedong statue
Source: Mao Zedong statue
Professor Tu's work was conducted at the height of the tumultuous Cultural Revolution

All Nobel prizes are special, but this one particularly so. Youyou Tu, an expert in Chinese traditional medicine who developed a breakthrough treatment for malaria, today became the first Chinese scientist to win the award for research carried out in China itself. Up until now, Chinese scholars had all conducted their award-winning research after leaving the country, usually for the West.

China’s failure to win a home-grown Nobel prize has long been a source of concern, even embarrassment, domestically. Often blamed is China’s school system, which many in the country believe destroys creativity through a numbing combination of rote learning and extreme pressure testing.

“No one, after 12 years of Chinese education, has any chance to receive a Nobel prize, even if he or she goes to Harvard, Yale, Oxford or Cambridge for college,” blogged the Peking University professor Zheng Yefu in 2013. “Out of the one billion people who have been educated in Mainland China since 1949, there has been no Nobel prizewinner,” argued Professor Zheng, who in the same year published a popular book called The Pathology of Chinese Education. “This forcefully testifies [to] the power of education in destroying creativity on behalf of the [Chinese] society.”

His point about China having no Nobel prizewinners isn’t strictly true: Liu Xiaobo, currently languishing in prison for daring to call for democratic elections and freedom of expression, won the Prize for Peace in 2010 (he was represented by an empty chair at the prize ceremony). The Dalai Lama was also awarded the Peace Prize in 1989. Writer Mo Yan won the Literature Prize in 2012.

But the point stands – true excellence in science was seen as elusive. Two years ago, Cong Cao, an associate professor and reader at the School of Contemporary Chinese Studies, University of Nottingham, predicted that the “Nobel pursuit will continue to vex the Chinese for many years to come”.

The wait is now over. What makes Professor Tu’s accomplishment even more extraordinary is that her breakthroughs came during the Cultural Revolution, China’s episode of political madness that saw universities and schools shut for long periods during the late 1960s and 1970s as rival bands of student radicals fought over who were the most revolutionary.

Professor Tu later recalled that during this chaotic period there was no way to perform clinical trials on her emerging anti-malarial drug, so she and her colleagues volunteered to be the first to take the compound to see if it was safe. Given that the work took place against a background of extreme anti-intellectualism, getting a Nobel prize for research during the Cultural Revolution is rather like winning the Olympic 100m final in hobnail boots.

But her extraordinary work does not necessarily mean that Chinese science has emphatically come of age. For a start, the prize is for research done decades ago. It is not the fruit of the huge sums of money poured into Chinese science since the turn of the century. There are also still concerns that Chinese academia has a “toxic” culture of favouritism and fraud, while a 2010 survey found that more than nine in 10 Chinese doctoral candidates stayed in the US after receiving their degrees. But hopefully Professor Tu’s prize will give young Chinese researchers hope that they can make lifesaving breakthroughs without leaving for the West. 

david.matthews@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

My recent visit to Tsinghua University of Beijing left me with a positive impression. We were fortunate to coincide with the Country's celebrations of the end of 2nd world war (70 years), which had meant that a number of industries around Beijing had reduced their emissions and car traffic had been cut to half, clearing the skies and making the campus looking more like one would imagine the Emperor's gardens to be (the Universities were built on such premises). Not only was outdoors inspiring, the labs were also fantastically well equiped and the students full of energy. Interestingly, my host Bing Zhou, with whom our coinciding interests lie in the study of fruit fly metal biology, shared with me his unpublished work treating the flies with artemisinin, a traditional Chinese herb component that has attracted his attention! I was therefore introduced to Professor Tu's story, with no clue she would so soon enter the hall of fame… https://fanismissirlis.wordpress.com/2015/09/13/china/

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

Laurel and Hardy sawing a plank of wood

Working with other academics can be tricky so follow some key rules, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham