‘Usualising’ transgendered people can help break down stereotypes

Trans people deserve visibility that recognises them as unique individuals, not whether they fit society’s expectations of them, says Pippa Catterall 

February 19, 2019
prejudice
Source: iStock

The first time that I presented as a trans woman at work our wonderfully friendly porter greeted me as usual, then looked at me quizzically and said, “Why do you look like a girl?”. 

I explained that I had been conscious of being trans since I was about seven, but had only now plucked up the courage to publicly acknowledge who I really am. He burst out laughing, then stopped and said, “Oh, you’re serious”. I replied, “Why would I joke about something like that?”

It’s not a joke, but it’s not something to get hypersensitive about either. Anxiety about how you look and sound or how others react to you is understandable, and not just for trans people. But responding defensively when misgendered or dead-named does not, I think, help. 

As my colleague Anick, a mentoring administrator in our university’s careers department, said recently when introducing his excellent autobiographical film about another historically occluded group, The Intersex Diaries, we have to “usualise” ourselves. I agree with him that “usualising”, rather than the conforming implications of “normalising”, is a good way to think about 

Like many trans people, I hid who I was for far too long from an often hostile heteronormative culture. It is therefore important to me to establish a visibility that generally has been denied us. “Usualising” in this way has been remarkably easy for me so far. The porters all adjusted rapidly. My students were even kind enough to applaud when I came out to them. And the tedious process of changing my name on all the university databases – who knew it appeared so many times – was handled with alacrity.

There are other adjustments as well. On a societal level, while I like to think that I’ve always been conscious of the gendered nature of public spaces and discourse I am, for instance, even more aware now that de Certeau’s network of urban glances are much more male than female. Sociologically, it has been fascinating to notice how both male and female colleagues treat me differently. 

In particular, that I am now included in conversations about distinctly female experiences and disadvantages is a form of sharing which is, to me, much more important than passing physically as a woman. 

Meanwhile, although I am by no means sure that it passes as female, my voice has undoubtedly changed and for the first time in my career, students are asking me to speak up.

The focus on “usualising” has meant that my head of school and I decided against making some special announcement about my transitioning. Accordingly, many colleagues learned about my transition through word of mouth or when doing a double take along a corridor. On one hand, I had to keep coming out to people, not that someone who earns a living by explaining things should find that too much of a chore. 

But on the other, it meant that the news of my transition was conveyed on a human scale, rather than officially. People were responding to the human being they already knew, albeit in a slightly different persona, rather than to a stereotype.

Not that I’ve met much stereotyping at my university, where trans people come in all varieties among both the students and staff. I’ve certainly encountered all kinds of stereotyping in other settings, some of which would be hilarious if it did not have such serious consequences on people’s lives.  

Only through acknowledging that every trans person is different, and “usualising” it as part of humanity’s own rich diversity, can we work towards eliminating some of that dangerous stereotyping. No one should have to feel suicidal, as I did for much of my life, simply because they do not fit into some societally imposed norm. 

When I explained this at the start of my paper at a recent conference on church history, someone in the audience shouted “praise God!”. It was an unexpected reaction to a coming-out narrative. However, if it helps to “usualise” us, I’m all for it.

Pippa Catterall is a transgender woman and professor of history and policy at the University of Westminster.

Please Login or Register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

Are not gay men (like myself) who have no sexual interest in women 'intersex'? We are truly between both male and female, forming a gender group that is unique.
A trans person to a human population is what a Great Depression is to a financial market – a highly improbable phenomenon, that Naseem Taleb called a Black Swan. Luckily, in the 21st century we have learned not to turn a Black Swan into a Black Sheep, but to usualize it will take more than a bit of sophistry, such as calling heterosexual norms “stereotypes”. The author writes that “no one chooses to be trans” implying that it is a condition akin to a disability or disorder that one has to simply deal with; yet, on the other hand, she also asks us to accept their “coming out”, implying that it is albeit difficult, but deliberate decision, a rebellion against those stereotypical norms. She also hopes that she will be welcomed as a fully-fledged member of (overwhelmingly) heterosexual society. So before we do that, let’s ask what exactly are we supposed to usualize – a condition that haunts her, or a rebellion that she chooses? Unfortunately, neither of these two are typically referred to as something “usual” – conditions are usually treated, whereas rebellions, well, are usually crushed, otherwise they won’t be called that. So I am guessing the author asks for sympathy, as she will neither be treated nor defeated, so to speak. And she certainly has my sympathy – it must be hard to be stuck between the desire to wallow in a condition or to revel in a rebellion. But we, the stereotypical ones, must ask the hard questions. If it is a condition, then can we know more about it from clinical studies? And if it is a rebellion then against what? My theory is that in older men like her, nearly 60 years old, transition is a response to an emotional trauma which must be so painful that one would rather change gender to escape the self than deal with it in a meaningful psychological and spiritual way. It must be cathartic to say “I am not that person anymore!” and close the door on all that. Hence the feeling of being both crippled in some way (“No one chooses to be me”) and staging a rebellion (“Coming out against your stereotypes”). But yet, herein lies the very modern problem – by choosing the escape route and rejecting a path of spiritual renewal to lead authentic, albeit painful life, we are asking others to pay the price. What are the loved ones to make of it – a father who became a mother, a boyfriend who became a girlfriend, a husband, who became a wife, a teacher who is now a different person? Taleb calls it “no skin in the game” phenomenon, where the burden of the problem created by me alone is nonetheless born entirely by others. Like I said, being a Black Swan is not the same as being a Black Sheep, but the least we can ask of her is to recognize who pays the price.

Sponsored