Writtle fined £250K over shortfall on promised outreach spending

Essex institution becomes second institution to be hit by Office for Students access penalty

January 11, 2019
Offside flag

England’s higher education regulator will fine Writtle University College £250,000 after a significant shortfall on student outreach spending was brought to light by the institution.

The Office for Students, detailing the “major access agreement breach”, said that it was informed by the Essex institution “in May 2018 about its failures to comply with the provisions of its access agreements for 2012-13 to 2017-18”.

Chris Millward, the director for fair access and participation, then “instructed the university college to commission an independent assurance review in order to investigate the shortfalls between commitment and actual spend, and to submit a report to the Office for Students”.

He “concluded that there had been no deficit in spending on financial support for students, but there had been a total deficit in spending on outreach over the six-year period of £776,120”, the OfS said.

Writtle, which provides land-based, animal, environmental, design and sport education courses, is the second institution to be fined by the OfS. The regulator said in November that it had withheld £66,000 from the University of Hertfordshire’s grant funding for this year because it had “persistently” overcharged students taking a franchised course at a partner college.

The OfS will withhold £250,000 from Writtle’s grant over three years from 2019-20.

The penalty takes into account “the active approach taken by the university college’s new leadership in highlighting the breach to the Office for Students”, the regulator said.

Writtle said that it had since “developed a comprehensive action plan to improve internal controls and ensure that this issue cannot be repeated”.

Tim Middleton, Writtle’s vice-chancellor, said: “As soon as I became aware of the issue and its significance, I contacted the Office for Students and met with them to explain the situation.

“I felt it was important for complete transparency and have since worked jointly with my new team and external advisors to rectify our position. I am confident that our new approach will meet all the requirements of the regulator.”

john.morgan@timeshighereducation.com

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Related articles

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Viewed

The University of Oxford is top in a list of the best universities in the UK, which includes institutions in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland

26 September

Most Commented

Most universities still rely on exams and assessed essays to grade their students. But as the fourth industrial revolution, employability and student satisfaction all rise up the agenda, many experts are suggesting that assessment needs to much more closely resemble real-world tasks. Anna McKie marks the arguments   

23 May

Sponsored