Willetts: student expansion plan ‘perfectly possible’

It is “perfectly possible” to fund the government’s plan to abolish the student numbers cap by selling off graduate debt, David Willetts has claimed.

December 17, 2013

The universities and science minister told a conference in London that the coalition was currently consulting the financial services industry over the sale of income-contingent student loans, which were introduced by prime minister Tony Blair in 2006. Such a sale could bring in around £12 billion over a five-year period, starting in the next two years, Mr Willetts said.

“The [student loan book] sale that happened a month or two back was the last remaining sale of the old mortgage-style loan book, which was a far inferior model for financing higher education,” he said in response to claims that the government had failed to reap the maximum return from that particular transaction.

The income-contingent loans were “completely different”, he said, and would bring in “more than enough to finance any likely increase in student numbers”.

Mr Willetts told delegates at the Study UK Annual Conference 2013 that there had been a “misinterpretation” of the sale of the student loan book, with many in the sector wrongly believing it to be “a one-off selling of the family silver”.

“Actually, the new assets of each year’s graduate repayments are accumulating. It would perfectly possible, if successive government’s wished, to continue with annual programmes of sale of the graduate debt,” he said.

Elsewhere in his address, the minister said that despite the abolition of the student cap, number controls would remain in place for alternative providers that offer “higher risk provision” and fail to meet “high standards”.

“The challenge for us with alternative providers has simply been that the surge in spending on fee loans and maintenance loans has presented us with a significant fiscal challenge,” he said.

“The number of students [accessing such support] more than doubled between 2011-12 and 2012-13, and the plans for 2013-14 were galloping ahead despite us signalling that there was some need for prudence because of expenditure pressures.”

He said that most of this “unplanned growth” had come from a small number of providers that had since been asked to “desist from recruiting further students this year”.

According to Mr Willetts, alternative providers will be able to apply for exemption for student number controls from 2015-16, but to be successful they will have to prove that they are not “high risk”. The ability to offer validated degrees was one of the criteria that Mr Willetts suggested might be used to judge the reputation of alternative providers.

“I don’t like number controls either in alternative providers or in mainstream [education],” he said. “But the level of budgetary pressure we were facing as a result of very rapid growth in alternative providers made it very difficult for us.”

He added: “I still…look forward to a day when there is a single regime for all providers, regardless of their historic origins.”

chris.parr@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Scholar in Medicine

University Of Queensland

Manager, Research Systems and Performance

Auckland University Of Technology

Lecturer in Aboriginal Allied Health

University Of South Australia

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery

Western Sydney University

College General Manager, SHE

La Trobe University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham