Vocational value fails to impress

May 10, 1996

Government efforts to raise the status and value of post-16 vocational qualifications have failed, a report published this week concludes.

It says the gap between the aspirations of school-leavers aiming for academic qualifications and the ambitions of those hoping to gain a vocational award has widened. The image that pupils approaching further education have of vocational qualifications is still work orientated. They are not seen as a way into higher education.

A national survey of school-leavers conducted by researchers at Southampton University's school of education found that nearly all pupils aiming for academic qualifications were hoping to go on to higher education, compared with just a quarter of those taking vocational courses.

Half of the pupils surveyed were aiming for "straight" academic courses and another 11 per cent aiming chiefly for an A level while studying a mixture of academic and vocational subjects.

A report on the findings concludes that most school-leavers distrust the capacity of vocational qualifications to deliver a place in higher education.

The survey, sponsored by the Higher Education Information Services Trust, also found that the academic reputation of post-16 institutions was the most important influence on school-leavers' choices of where they wished to study. Academic standing was cited as a reason for choosing an institution by almost three quarters of pupils, while its location and information presented in prospectuses were mentioned by just under 40 per cent.

Student Decision-making and the Post-16 Market Place. From the Centre for Research in Education Marketing, University of Southampton, Pounds 35.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns