Use of contextual data must become commonplace, Milburn says

Considering a pupil’s social background in admissions should become the “norm, not the exception”, the government’s social mobility tsar has said.

November 29, 2011

Speaking yesterday at the Access on Action conference in London, Alan Milburn said it was time for universities to “grasp the nettle of contextual data” when selecting pupils for admission.

The former health secretary and Labour MP is due to publish a report on social mobility, focusing on higher education, in the spring in his role as the government’s independent reviewer on social mobility and child poverty.

Using information on a candidate’s school and family income was vital to ensure “access to university is genuinely open to the widest possible range of students”, he said

Research also suggested that students from state schools generally performed better than those from private schools if they achieved the same results at A-level, he added.

“Clearly academic attainment should remain key to a university place,” Mr Milburn said.

“If you can’t do maths at school it’s unlikely you will be able to do it at university. No other single indicator provides better evidence of how a young person will get on at university than their A-level results.

“But they are not fool-proof in predicting future performance.

“We know from Hefce [the Higher Education Funding Council for England] evidence that a typical state school pupil - once they get in to university - performs at the same or at a higher level than privately educated pupils who have better A-level grades.

“Studies at the University of Bristol and at the University of Oxford have bolstered that evidence base.

“They suggest that a pupil getting good but lower A-level grades from a poorly performing school may do better at university than somebody with better A levels from a high performing school.”

Mr Milburn said he thought that most people would accept that “a youngster with no family history of going to university from a disadvantaged area, attending a low achieving school, has had to work harder to get decent A-levels than a similar youngster who has attended a top school, having been brought up by well-off parents, who know the university system like the back of their hand”.

Universities were fearful of advancing arguments regarding contextual data after the “media onslaught” against those, such as Bristol, that advocated the approach, he said.

“Universities have to summon up the courage to get out and make a positive argument for change,” he added. “It cannot be done surreptitiously.

“It has to be done openly. It means confronting the argument that greater fairness means lower quality.”

Institutions that refuse to view social mobility as part of their responsibilities should face financial penalties, he added.

“To those universities I say if you are not prepared to serve the public good, you shouldn’t accept public finance,” he said.

jack.grove@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

men in office with feet on desk. Vintage

Three-quarters of respondents are dissatisfied with the people running their institutions

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes

Canal houses, Amsterdam, Netherlands

All three of England’s for-profit universities owned in Netherlands

As the country succeeds in attracting even more students from overseas, a mixture of demographics, ‘soft power’ concerns and local politics help explain its policy