Turnitin is turning up fewer cases of plagiarism

Cases of serious cheating fall by 60 per cent, company says

April 4, 2013

The amount of serious plagiarism committed by UK students has declined by 60 per cent since 2005, according to detection service Turnitin.

Figures released by the firm reveal that 7.7 per cent of the essays assessed in 2005 in the UK using its software consisted of more than 75 per cent unoriginal - and therefore potentially plagiarised - content. By 2012, that figure had fallen to 3.1 per cent.

The proportion of work that was more than 50 per cent unoriginal fell from 10.5 per cent in 2005 to 6.6 per cent in 2012.

The firm attributes the reduction to a 2002 decision by universities’ IT body Jisc to establish a national plagiarism advisory service, now known as PlagiarismAdvice.org, which initially provided Turnitin software free to all UK higher education institutions. It is now used by 98 per cent of UK institutions, and the number of essays it screens has increased 50-fold since 2005, to more than 5 million in 2012.

Gill Rowell, academic adviser at Turnitin, told the Committee on Publication Ethics’ European Seminar 2013 in London on 22 March that the incidence of deliberate plagiarism was lower than the reported figures suggested because most of the detected matches stemmed from students’ misunderstanding of “academic conventions”.

She said the most important aspect of PlagiarismAdvice.org - which had been replicated around the world - had been to raise the profile of student plagiarism within institutions, such that most of them had now adopted policies on the issue.

Phil Newton, superintendent of assessment at Swansea University, said Turnitin was a “fundamentally important” tool for plagiarism detection. However, he cautioned that it did not pick up on all forms of plagiarism. For instance, it struggled to detect content hidden behind paywalls on essay mills’ websites and would not flag up bought essays that had been written to order.

“It is my personal experience that Turnitin misses a lot of matches and gives incomplete reports for a lot of others,” he said.

Dr Newton added that students were probably becoming more savvy about the sources it could and could not detect. “A quick Google search identifies ways of evading detection, although the success of these approaches is questionable,” he said.

But Will Murray, vice-president of Turnitin International, noted that as all submissions remained in Turnitin’s database, instances of plagiarism that were not initially flagged up could be discovered later as the software became more sophisticated.

“Essay sites, for example, reuse students’ work. Any student using a bespoke essay will get caught at some point,” he said.


Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Reader's comments (1)

Turnitin has proven very useful in shortening the length of academic misconduct panels as most students feel unable to contest such evidence. However, as I regularly warn colleagues and students, Turnitin is not the be-all and end-all of plagiarism detection. In addition to the paid-for essays noted here, it is not strong on plagiarism of statistical data or sources which are not available electronically or only accessible by members of professional bodies. Some students under-estimate the capabilities of Turnitin and think they can trick it easily, but many more under-estimate the plagiarism detection abilities of academic staff. I was involved in plagiarism cases even before the internet was in common use by students but younger colleagues have the same kind of skills, even though students may contest there. Turnitin is a useful tool but it is one among a number of techniques that staff use. As noted here, the ability of Turnitin to store material over the years is increasingly useful as I encounter more cases of self-plagiarising, people resubmitting work they had handed in previously at another institution or for another module at the same institution. I am sure if the bulk of A level work was sent through Turnitin we would find a lot more cases like this. In my view prevention is always better than cure and extensive and sustained teaching for students of all kinds in good academic writing should always be the starting point. However, Turnitin works as a good deterrent for many and as a sound provider of evidence when plagiarism cases are brought.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments