State and private school university approaches compared

State schools need to move beyond a “narrow focus” on exams in order to help increase aspirations for pupils to attend university

December 30, 2014

Source: Alamy

That is among the conclusions of University of Sussex researchers, who have explored the “differentiated patterns of HE application” which distinguish independent from state schools.

To throw light on the issue, Máiréad Dunne, Russell King and Jill Ahrens collected data from 1,400 Year 13 students in 18 Sussex and Leicestershire schools and carried out in-depth interviews with 15 teacher higher education advisers.

In every case, they sought information about the types of institutions the pupils applied to; “the way the application process was managed”; and how advisers “explained the HE application process and outcomes for their students”. They then compared the findings from the 11 independent and seven state schools.

The results are set out in an article in the November 2014 issue of Studies in Higher Education, “Applying to higher education: comparisons of independent and state schools”.

While both types of school “showed appreciation of experiences outside the formal curriculum”, those within the independent sector showed “a more concerted and co-ordinated effort to provide these experiences and capitalise on them”.

More generally, “independent schools assume a HE career for their students, invest more resources, start the process earlier, are more proactive in increasing their students’ capital and aspire to get their students into higher-status universities and courses”.

In state schools, by contrast, “the approach to HE applications appeared to be less ambitious even for the high achieving students”, which only works to legitimise arbitrary “relations within and between the educational and social hierarchies”.

The evidence they present, the authors conclude, has important implications for those committed to widening access.

“An individualised approach to improving examination performance and encouraging less privileged students to apply” will never be enough without taking account of the social factors which influence “the production of individual choices”.

It remained crucial to “shift the narrow focus of state schools, teachers and pupils beyond only the examinations”.

matthew.reisz@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (2)

Has anyone ever factored in the huge advantages private schools enjoy when it comes to funding and facilities? The playing field (if you can find one in a state school) is hardly level.
Notably, besides exam results, the web sites of Private Independent sector schools tend to strongly feature extra curricular activities, sports fixtures and results (plus their usually excellent facilities). Similarly, the better performers in the State sector, usually. Maybe suggesting more inter-sector cultural collaborations and extra time/resources needed for these activities.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

United Nations peace keeper

Understanding the unwritten rules of graduate study is vital if you want to get the most from your PhD supervision, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

David Parkins Christmas illustration (22 December 2016)

A Dickensian tale, set in today’s university

Eleanor Shakespeare illustration (5 January 2017)

Fixing problems in the academic job market by reducing the number of PhDs would homogenise the sector, argues Tom Cutterham

Houses of Parliament, Westminster, government

There really is no need for the Higher Education and Research Bill, says Anne Sheppard

British dean of US business school also questions the ‘strange’ trend of increasing regulation while reducing state funding in the UK sector