Standards proposal threatens PhD cuts

June 14, 2002

Universities that cannot provide supervisors from departments with research assessment exercise ratings of 3a or above will get no cash for PhD students under Higher Education Funding Council for England proposals.

In the plans, which could be introduced as early as next year, funding will depend on universities adhering to a standards framework along the lines of the Quality Assurance Agency, with regular external reviews.

The research councils are also planning to sign up to the proposed regime.

The framework, drawn up by Janet Metcalfe, director of the Centre of Excellence, the research councils' graduate schools programme, will define threshold standards for institutions.

It sets out the academic standards, the responsibilities of supervisor and student, and the administrative process that would be required in each of eight areas:

* There must be a critical mass (five research-active staff between at least ten students is suggested)

* Selection, admission, enrolment and induction of students

* A supervisory team of at least two; regular meetings between the main supervisor and the team n At least one supervisor from a 3a or above department

* An initial review and subsequent progress reports

* Provision of programmes of research and transferable skills training

* Feedback for students, supervisors and institution

* Appeals and complaints mechanisms.

The proposed framework will be published in the next month.

* The British Academy has called for urgent reform of postgraduate research and early academic career structures.

A new report, Incentives for Excellence , calls for more awards in the humanities and social sciences, phased waiving of student debt, increased PhD stipends and improved academic pay and conditions.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns