Staff redundancies totalled 3,000 before fees hike

More than 3,000 higher education staff were made redundant as the sector prepared for the introduction of £9,000 tuition fees, a new study says.

July 5, 2013

About 18 academic staff and 25 support staff were laid off at each higher education institution on average in 2011-12, according to a new workforce survey published by the Universities and Colleges Employers Association on 4 July.

The reduction in staff numbers, which relate to 79 of the 85 institutions which responded to Ucea’s survey, follows two previous years of “major restructuring”, the report says.

Twenty-nine per cent of the institutions said they were likely to make further cuts in academic staff numbers in 2012-13, while 36 per cent envisaged reducing support staff numbers.

However, the 2.4 per cent fall in higher education staff numbers from 2009-10 to 2011-12 was less than half the 5.4 per cent fall in public sector employment over the same period, the report says.

The reportalso shows that turnover across all higher education staff groups (8.3 per cent) was relatively low compared with the rest of the economy (12.7 per cent), while academic staff turnover was even lower at 7.5 per cent.

Recruitment of staff was also not a problem for most institutions, with only 2 per cent saying they “usually” or “always” had difficulties recruiting staff.

However, there were some difficulties recruiting the right academic staff, with 14 per cent of institutions saying that it had become harder to recruit than a year earlier.

While academic recruitment difficulties as not widespread, a significant number of universities faced on-going difficulties recruiting professorial and lecturing staff in business and administrative studies and those subjects related to the built environment, such as civil engineering, building and architecture.

There were also challenges recruiting professors and lecturers in education, creative subjects, politics, economics and biological sciences.

Regarding types of employment, only 13 per cent of institutions indicated that they had increased the number of staff on non-permanent contracts as a response to on-going uncertainty in the operating environment compared with 29 per cent of organisations in the public sector and 20 per cent for all organisations in the UK.

Helen Fairfoul, chief executive of Ucea, said the survey results show a positive picture of the higher education labour market overall.

“Against the backdrop of challenge across the whole economy, it is evident that HEIs have been focusing on remaining attractive places in which to work, finding and keeping the excellent workforce we need,” she said.

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham