Quality assurance burden £1 billion, says study

Cost rises to £1.1 billion with FE and alternative providers added

June 30, 2015
A pen and a clipboard
Source: iStock

Almost 8 per cent of university teaching budgets – equivalent to £1 billion a year – is spent on complying with measures to uphold academic standards, a study says.

Assessing the full economic costs associated with quality assurance, including academic staff time, consultants at KPMG estimated that it costs the UK’s 130 higher education institutions just over £1 billion to carry out the required checks on quality.

When  the costs incurred by further education colleges and alternative providers are added, this rises to £1.1 billion, according to the report, The Cost to Providers in England of Existing Quality Assurance and Quality Assessment Practices, published yesterday.

The document was released alongside proposals to overhaul the way universities are inspected in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, which include the abolition of six-yearly institutional reviews for universities.

According to the costing document, about 38 per cent of the £1 billion cost relates to the time spent by academics ensuring that quality checks are completed. About £380 million is spent on overheads, such as the cost of premises, incurred while completing this work.

Another 9 per cent of the £1 billion (£90 million) is spent directly on staff involved in the quality assurance regime.

Asked how much institutions could save if external quality assurance requirements – such as Quality Assurance Agency reviews – were scrapped, institutions differed on how much would be saved, with some saying that the work would need to carried out anyway.

However, if those institutions sceptical about potential savings are excluded, KPMG estimates that universities could save about £90 million each year if external checks were abolished.

It also states that the total cost to the sector for preparing for a QAA review is £2.8 million per review – or £127,000 per institution, assuming that they are undertaken every six years.

The total cost of preparation for institutional visits by professional bodies is £5 million – at about £38,000 per institution per year on average. Running the external examining system costs only £26 million each year in total at about £18 per student, it says.

Other costs include: institutional subscriptions to the QAA (£3.8 million); subscriptions and other costs for the Office for the Independent Adjudicator (£3.7 million); and the running of governance structures within institutions (£8.2 million).

jack.grove@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride