Scottish universities ‘should follow the Ivy League model’

Scottish universities should privatise and adopt an Ivy League-style system of high tuition fees and bursaries to protect their standing, according to a leading educationalist.

April 13, 2011

Lord Sutherland, a former principal of the University of Edinburgh and vice-chancellor of the University of London, made the suggestions in an address at the University of St Andrews.

Delivering the annual Sir Malcolm Knox Memorial Lecture yesterday, he said society had failed Scottish universities, which do not charge home students fees, by not accepting “the fact that the building of a system of mass higher education comes at a cost”.

Lord Sutherland said that in 1946, only 2.5 per cent of young British people went to university. By 2002, the proportion in Scotland had risen to 50 per cent.

He also observed that the country that used to have just four ancient universities now has 19 higher education institutions.

Warning that universities could not afford to continue “without significant injection of taxpayers’ money or charges of one kind or another to the recipients”, he said suggestions that the funding gap could be filled by philanthropy or contributions from business were unrealistic. Efficiency savings could be made, he added, but were no solution.

“The Westminster government accepted this five years ago…but Holyrood has shown itself unwilling to face up to this,” Lord Sutherland said.

He argued that society had also failed universities by not questioning their role and purpose. “We – society, the taxpayers and the government – have let universities down badly by not being clear about what is expected of them.”

Lord Sutherland called on Scottish universities to privatise the faculties and departments the government was now refusing to fund, freeing themselves from state interference.

They could then set their own fees at a level that allows a “needs-blind” admission system, he said. “This is a staple of some of the best US private universities, [and] would be designed to channel a significant percentage of income from fees and other sources to support the best students who could not otherwise afford to enrol,” he said.

“These measures, seen as drastic by some, may well be forced on some of the best English universities. Scottish universities would be well advised to prepare for very tough post-election bargaining by examining the feasibility and desirability of such changes.”

hannah.fearn@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns