Scots funders shun English quality union

May 31, 1996

The Scottish Higher Education Funding Council has underlined its arm's-length approach to a single United Kingdom quality agency by vetoing the transfer of its quality assessment responsibilities to the new agency in January 1997.

John Sizer, SHEFC's chief executive, is a full member of the joint planning group on quality assurance in higher education, but following the group's first report SHEFC says it needs to know more before it decides whether to subscribe to the new system.

It does not intend to make a decision until it feels sure that the new system would uphold what it considers to be key principles of its own quality assessment system. These include taking specific account of the distinctive characteristics of Scottish higher education, providing SHEFC with information on the full range of subjects in the institutions it funds, and trying to improve quality by disseminating good practice.

But SHEFC has not ruled out eventual convergence, giving some slight comfort to the Committee of Scottish Higher Education Principals, which wants to see a single quality assurance system covering the whole of the UK.

Ronald Crawford, secretary of COSHEP, said: "We are not surprised by the line being taken by SHEFC." The committees's response to the joint planning group's report had stressed that it wanted a single system, said Dr Crawford, but had also expressed a number of misgivings, not least that the proposed system did not seem at first sight to present a more economic solution.

SHEFC's first cycle of quality assessments ends in 1997-98, and it could develop its own system in the light of a purely Scottish review. Sir Ronald Miller, a former member of SHEFC and former executive chairman of Dawson International plc, is chairing an 11-member review group set up jointly by SHEFC and COSHEP, which is due to report in September.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns