Safeguarding science's foundations

May 3, 1996

The recommendations about science research funding in universities from the NAPAG are worrying. Clearly, there is a worsening problem of funding science research in universities and, if the current or future governments fail to increase research cash in real terms, then British universities will find it difficult to undertake high quality research and compete internationally.

There is, however, a fundamental flaw in polarising available research funds into only "3a, 4 and 5" rated departments. This system does not sufficiently recognise individual research scientists. Good science is essentially about individuals and not necessarily large "expensive" groups of scientists in a few high-rated centres. Instead of withdrawing funds from departments "low-rated" in the RAE, the funding system should identify individual researchers or groups in such departments that are highly rated and target funds appropriately.

Philip Craig, Professor of biology, University of Salford

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments