Report on the Proposed Regulation Concerning the Financial Instrument for the Environment (Life)

December 11, 2003

Brussels, 10 Dec 2003

Full text of Document 15654/03
Suite of documents 15654/03

No. prev. doc.: 15175/03 ENV 634 FIN 534 CODEC 1658

  • No. Cion prop.: 14716/03 ENV 612 FIN 490 CODEC 1581 - COM(2003) 667 final
  • Subject: Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1655/2000 concerning the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE)

    1. The Commission adopted the above-mentioned proposal in November 2003, at the same time as a mid-term review of Regulation (EC) No 1655/2000 (LIFE) (doc. 14732/03).

    2. The key aims of the proposal are:

    * to extend the third phase of LIFE until 31 December 2006, to bridge the gap between the expiry of the current regime and the new, post-2006 financial perspectives;

    * to make LIFE consistent with the 6th Environmental Action Programme and Regulation (EC) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities; and

    * to amend the comitology provisions to substitute the management committee procedure for the regulatory one in the light of European Court of Justice's judgement of 21 January 2003.

    The proposal supersedes the proposal that the Commission made in July 2003 (doc. 11336/03 ), which dealt only with the comitology issue.

    3. The Working Party on the Environment examined the proposal at its meetings on 20 November and 5 December.

    Delegations welcomed the proposal and agreed that early adoption of the Regulation would be desirable. They noted that this would require the Council and the European Parliament to reach agreement during first reading.

    The examination of the proposal has brought three key issues to light:

    * the proposed budget, which some consider insufficient, particularly in view of enlargement;

    * comitology, for which there is a wide preference for retaining the regulatory committee procedure; and

    * arrangements from 2007 onwards, where there is concern that the current text does not send any signals about the future funding of environmental policies and some would wish to include deadlines for proposals on, and agreement of, future arrangements.

    The representative of the Commission explained that the budget represented an increase of some 15% and was coherent with the current financial perspectives. He clarified that the aim of the report in September 2006 was to make a final assessment of Regulation (EC) No 1655/2000 , as amended. This would be separate from the ongoing development of an approach for the new, post-2006 financial perspectives.

    Council Register =>=>=>=>

  • Please login or register to read this article.

    Register to continue

    Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

    Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

    • Sign up for the editor's highlights
    • Receive World University Rankings news first
    • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
    • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

    Have your say

    Log in or register to post comments


    Featured jobs

    Senior Marketing Analyst

    Bpp University

    Professor of PV Systems and Reliability

    King Abdullah University Of Science & Technology

    Lecturer in Public Health

    University Of Greenwich