Pseuds warning

August 7, 1998

WHY do you commission book reviews from people who believe that any amount of pretentious nonsense is acceptable, providing that it is written badly enough? Edward Neill's review of Queer Forster (THES, July 31) was crammed with parentheses, forced alliteration ("the macho-ised proponents of a masculinist modernism prone to mug anything 'effeminate'"), dreadful puns ("a 'camp site' as George Piggford pleasantly puts it, whose camp sightings may include camp citings of the pious and the platitudinous") and ugly jargon ("positively valorised") and bespattered with inverted commas and dropped names ("truly Hegel is everywhere") (my emphasis). Will you stop it if I threaten to send these gems to Private Eye for their "Pseuds Corner" column?

Penny Tucker Hartley Wintney, Hants

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments