Procedure for Approval of New COST (European Co-operation in Science and Technology) Actions (link)

October 4, 2004

Brussels, 01 Oct 2004

Full text of Document 301/04
Suite of documents 301/04

The JAF Group has revised the document "Shortening the lead-time for the implementation of new COST Actions" (COST 2/04) as requested by the CSO (Annex).

The TC Chairs have been advised that, considering the envisaged dates for the CSO meetings in the year 2005, the dates by which the proposals for new Actions should be sent to CSO members are: 15 January, 15 April, 15 September.

The TC Chairs have also been advised that for the remainder of the year 2004, considering that the CSO meeting is scheduled for 1 and 2 December and considering the envisaged dates of the next TC meetings, it is proposed that:

* a first batch of 6 recommended Actions will be sent to CSO members before 1 September and that for these Actions CSO National Coordinators will be asked to declare an intention to sign and to provide the nominations of the MC members during the CSO meeting in December and the COST Office will endeavour to convene the kick- off meetings of these Actions before Christmas if more than 5 intentions to sign and related nominations are received;

* a second batch of recommended Actions will be sent to CSO members by 15 October to be approved by the CSO during the meeting in December.


[Public Info Net automatically generates links to Council Register documents where an appropriately formatted document number is given. However, the document may not be available for public use and/or it may not be loaded on the Council Register yet.]

Council Register

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns