Prizewinning duo

May 31, 1996

In my Don's Diary (THES, April 26) I mentioned that I was offering a prize of Pounds 100 for the first person to demonstrate a definite error in my "bare hands" proof of Fermat's last theorem. Then on May 10 Roger Fenn challenged me to a wager on the result, which, incidentally, I accepted by private letter.

Now one of Fenn's colleagues, Richard Lewin, has won the prize by showing numerically that Lemma 5.1 in my proof is wrong. It is only a second-level lemma, near the end of the work, but the mistake means that there are extra cases to be considered, which are not covered by the reasoning: so the argument as given is not complete. Roger Fenn has won his wager too, and it has cost me twice as much as I expected, but at least some unexpected clarity has been achieved. I still think the "bare hands" approach is worth pursuing, though, because Fermat, if he did it, must have done it without modern algebraic tools.

Chris Ormell

School of education and professional development University of East Anglia

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns