Presidency Information note on Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies (link)

November 28, 2005

Brussels, 25 Nov 2005

Full text of Document 14990/05
Suite of documents 14990/05

No. Cion doc.: 10013/05 RECH 134 - COM(2005) 243 final

Delegations will find in the Annex an information note from the UK Presidency on the above- mentioned subject, which will be dealt with under "Other Business" at the Council (Environment) meeting on 2 December 2005. ANNEX Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee "Nanosciences and nanotechnologies: An action plan for Europe 2005-2009 Information note by the UK Presidency Introduction The Commission issued an action plan on nanotechnology in June 2005. This set out a series of actions for the Commission and Member States for the immediate implementation of a safe, integrated and responsible strategy for nanosciences and nanotechnologies. This has been developed through the Competitiveness Council, however the latter four points of the plan address issues relating to regulatory and societal dimensions, which will be of interest to the Environment Council. As new developments in nanosciences and nanotechnologies arise, products taking advantage of the special properties which materials exhibit at the nanoscale will enter manufacture, use and ultimately require disposal. There is global recognition that these special properties may offer both opportunities and threats to humanity and the environment. The structure of the Action Plan


Council Register Previous Item Back to Titles Print Item

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns