Poorer students ‘not studying key A levels’ for selective universities

Just a third of bright teenagers from poorer backgrounds take an A level likely to help them attend a selective university, a study says

March 17, 2015

Drawing on data which followed 3,000 young people through school from the age of three, researchers at the University of Oxford found just 33 per cent of poorer pupils who did well at the age of 11 went on to take a “facilitating subject” at A level.

Students hoping to attend a research intensive university are recommended to take at least one of the subjects, such as maths, English and modern languages, because they are seen to provide a good preparation for university-level study.

The study, titled Subject to Background: What Promotes Better Achievement for Bright but Disadvantaged Students?, was undertaken in partnership with the Sutton Trust, an educational charity which aims to get more poorer students into Russell Group universities and other selective institutions.

It shows that 58 per cent of students from richer areas took at least one facilitating subject.

The study also says that poorer students were more likely to gain good A-level results when they experience “academic enrichment” activities at home from the age of 11, including going on trips to museums and galleries, and reading for pleasure.

When they get into the habit of daily homework, students are nine times as likely to get three A levels, it adds.

Sir Peter Lampl, chairman of the Sutton Trust, said it was vital that “opportunities for academic enrichment outside school are available to all students”.

“The fact that bright disadvantaged students fall so far behind when they reach their A levels shows that government and schools urgently need to do more to support able students from less advantaged homes,” said Sir Peter.

“It is also vital that schools advise their students on the right subject choices at GCSE and A level so as to maximise their potential,” he said.

Pam Sammons, co-author of the report, said the study contains “important lessons” for teachers and policymakers seeking to reduce the equity gap in attainment.

“There is no silver bullet that alone can make a difference but a combination of good schools and pre-schools, the right home learning environment and supportive teachers ready to monitor progress and provide good feedback can all ensure that bright but disadvantaged students get the chance of a good university education.”

jack.grove@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

The best performing State schools and most Independents, strongly market their extracurricular offerings on web sites. I suspect many of the under performing schools are largely in locations where families value direct access to a trade or employment opportunity as the priority. Ready access to the new advanced apprenticeship scheme may be the way of capturing such candidates, allowing some perhaps to progress to Higher apprenticeships linked to a university degree, which mostly require (STEM) A levels or equivalent level 3 qualifications. However the highly selective universities will also need to get more involved for this to properly happen.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham