Plymouth plug-pulling draws watchdog's concern

Plymouth advised to tighten up procedures before ending correspondence courses. Jack Grove writes

July 28, 2011



Credit: Report Digital
Notice to quit: University 'must consult students over distance-learning provision'


A university has been told by the Quality Assurance Agency to review its procedures for terminating links with distance-learning providers.

The watchdog's recommendation follows the decision by the University of Plymouth to end its contract with Moustraining, a Devon-based company that ran two business IT programmes on behalf of the institution.

About 850 part-time students were signed up to the courses, on the use of Microsoft software, which were provided online and part-funded by the university.

Plymouth gave notice in June 2009 that it would not renew its contract with the company, which was set up in 2001 as a commercial spin-off from the university's business school.

Existing students were told that they needed to finish their studies by 2012.

The QAA received a complaint in November 2010, which claimed that the university had not consulted on its withdrawal and had withheld funding for two months from Moustraining.

Plymouth had not given enough time for existing students to complete their courses or to resit exams, it was claimed.

Alex Hammerstein, director of Moustraining, said: "It was an incredibly successful course but we were told it did not fit into their business model any more.

"We never had any problems with recruiting students and feedback was very good. Students had up to five years to complete their courses, so we received many complaints from students when we told them they had only two years.

"We are working flat out with students to ensure as many as possible complete their studies by next July."

The QAA has recommended that the university clarify its academic regulations on similar distance-learning programmes and consider consultation with students before ending courses.

However, it said that the two-year notice period given to students to complete their studies was reasonable and said that there was also no evidence that funding was withheld during negotiations over the run-out phase. It added that there were safeguards in place to protect students' interests.

Mary Watkins, senior deputy vice-chancellor at Plymouth, said: "This was the first occasion on which the university had effectively brought an existing partnership to a close. The QAA review has helpfully highlighted some procedural issues which the university is now addressing.

"The university and its private partner have worked together to ensure that existing students have the opportunity to complete their existing programme and neither the university nor QAA has identified any concerns about the quality of provision."

jack.grove@tsleducation.com.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

A podium constructed out of wood

There are good reasons why some big names are missing from our roster

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan