David Armstrong, 1926-2014

One of the leading Australian philosophers of his generation has died

June 19, 2014

David Armstrong was born in Melbourne on 8 July 1926. He attended the Dragon School in Oxford in the UK and then the Geelong Grammar School in Victoria, Australia, before serving in the Royal Australian Navy (1945-46) and taking his first degree at the University of Sydney (1947-50). Although he would later spend the bulk of his career at Sydney, he went to the University of Oxford for his BPhil (1952-54) and secured his first teaching job as assistant lecturer at what was then Birkbeck College, University of London (1954-55).

In 1956, however, Professor Armstrong returned to Australia as lecturer and then senior lecturer at the University of Melbourne (1956-63), where he was also awarded a PhD. From there he moved back to Sydney as Challis professor of philosophy (1964-91), becoming emeritus upon retirement. A conservative by temperament, he became embroiled in a fierce dispute that eventually saw a split between a department for traditional and modern philosophy and a more radical department for general philosophy.

When he started studying the subject, Professor Armstrong once told an interviewer, philosophy in the English-speaking world “had taken a very strange turn, one might say an unphilosophical turn. It had turned to small matters. In particular, it had turned towards language. You didn’t talk about Xs, you talked about talk about Xs.” Yet soon the influence of the philosopher John Anderson encouraged him to turn to bigger themes and to adopt as his “unofficial slogan…‘Put semantics last’. Do not look at what we say about things, but look at the things themselves.”

This soon led Professor Armstrong to “issues [that] seem to be among the most important theoretical and practical questions that one can raise: ‘Is the mind purely physical?’, ‘Are values objective or subjective?’ and so on. Some of us are drawn, perhaps like moths to a flame, to discuss such matters in an argumentative fashion. It is one of the ‘great games’ of the human mind.”

In attempting to answer such questions, Professor Armstrong developed a fully fledged system of metaphysics that made him the key figure in an informal group known as the “Australian materialists”. His major works include A Materialist Theory of Mind (1968), the two-volume Universals and Scientific Realism (1978) and What is a Law of Nature? (1983).

Professor Armstrong died after a long illness on 13 May and is survived by his second wife, Jennifer Mary de Bohun Clark, and his stepchildren.

matthew.reisz@tsleducation.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Scholar in Medicine

University Of Queensland

Manager, Research Systems and Performance

Auckland University Of Technology

Lecturer in Aboriginal Allied Health

University Of South Australia

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery

Western Sydney University

College General Manager, SHE

La Trobe University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham