David Armstrong, 1926-2014

One of the leading Australian philosophers of his generation has died

June 19, 2014

David Armstrong was born in Melbourne on 8 July 1926. He attended the Dragon School in Oxford in the UK and then the Geelong Grammar School in Victoria, Australia, before serving in the Royal Australian Navy (1945-46) and taking his first degree at the University of Sydney (1947-50). Although he would later spend the bulk of his career at Sydney, he went to the University of Oxford for his BPhil (1952-54) and secured his first teaching job as assistant lecturer at what was then Birkbeck College, University of London (1954-55).

In 1956, however, Professor Armstrong returned to Australia as lecturer and then senior lecturer at the University of Melbourne (1956-63), where he was also awarded a PhD. From there he moved back to Sydney as Challis professor of philosophy (1964-91), becoming emeritus upon retirement. A conservative by temperament, he became embroiled in a fierce dispute that eventually saw a split between a department for traditional and modern philosophy and a more radical department for general philosophy.

When he started studying the subject, Professor Armstrong once told an interviewer, philosophy in the English-speaking world “had taken a very strange turn, one might say an unphilosophical turn. It had turned to small matters. In particular, it had turned towards language. You didn’t talk about Xs, you talked about talk about Xs.” Yet soon the influence of the philosopher John Anderson encouraged him to turn to bigger themes and to adopt as his “unofficial slogan…‘Put semantics last’. Do not look at what we say about things, but look at the things themselves.”

This soon led Professor Armstrong to “issues [that] seem to be among the most important theoretical and practical questions that one can raise: ‘Is the mind purely physical?’, ‘Are values objective or subjective?’ and so on. Some of us are drawn, perhaps like moths to a flame, to discuss such matters in an argumentative fashion. It is one of the ‘great games’ of the human mind.”

In attempting to answer such questions, Professor Armstrong developed a fully fledged system of metaphysics that made him the key figure in an informal group known as the “Australian materialists”. His major works include A Materialist Theory of Mind (1968), the two-volume Universals and Scientific Realism (1978) and What is a Law of Nature? (1983).

Professor Armstrong died after a long illness on 13 May and is survived by his second wife, Jennifer Mary de Bohun Clark, and his stepchildren.

matthew.reisz@tsleducation.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Preceptor in Statistics

Harvard University

Postdoctoral Fellowship in Electrochemistry

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Research Positions in Nanotechnology

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Academic English Instructor

Nazarbayev University
See all jobs

Most Commented

Doctoral study can seem like a 24-7 endeavour, but don't ignore these other opportunities, advise Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman

Matthew Brazier illustration (9 February 2017)

How do you defeat Nazis and liars? Focus on the people in earshot, says eminent Holocaust scholar Deborah Lipstadt

Improvement, performance, rankings, success

Phil Baty sets out why the World University Rankings are here to stay – and why that's a good thing

Warwick vice-chancellor Stuart Croft on why his university reluctantly joined the ‘flawed’ teaching excellence framework

people dressed in game of thrones costume

Old Germanic languages are back in vogue, but what value are they to a modern-day graduate? Alice Durrans writes