When undertaking peer observation, says Paul Orsmond, senior lecturer in biology and an education researcher at Staffordshire University, “You need to avoid looking at someone and thinking, ‘that's not what I would do’, or trying to make a judgment. You should be saying, ‘that's interesting. I wonder why they did that’.”
Vaneeta D'Andrea, director of academic affairs and operations at Central St Martins College of Art and Design, University of the Arts London, says the best peer observation takes place when two colleagues observe each other. The worst is when observation for regulatory reasons is confused with that carried out for development.
David Gosling, a research fellow at Plymouth University and independent consultant in higher education, says it can be helpful to have a senior lecturer observing a less senior one and vice versa. It may also work to pair people from different departments but the same academic school so they don’t have too much personal history between them but do have some expertise in each other’s subject.
Caroline Walker-Gleaves, a professor in the School of Education at Sunderland University, recommends arranging for peer observation from people inside and outside a discipline. “Non-subject specialists will often not be afraid to ask ‘obvious’ questions and may give important pedagogic insights as a result,” she says.
D’Andrea says you should approach peer observation of a colleague like any other scholarly activity, first reading course materials, the course handbook and any other written evidence. Talk to the person you will be observing so you have both established ground rules for the observation and know what each would find useful for you to observe.
Walker-Gleaves says that if the observed person wants someone to watch out for aspects of a lecture or seminar such as dynamics and relationships, for example, it is useful to provide a narrative on the whole lesson – “a stream of consciousness but with an inquiring twist to it”.
She says such commentaries are powerful in shedding light on small interactions that the observed person may not be conscious of.
D’Andrea says that observation skills have to be learnt and recommends that academics take some kind of continuous professional development course before embarking on peer observation.
In The Lecturer’s Toolkit, Sally Brown says it is important not to observe new staff against a framework of detailed criteria intended for practised and experienced teachers. Nor should you put all the emphasis on presentation skills. You also need to observe the quality of handouts, overheads and class exercises.
She also advises against giving too much negative feedback, suggesting three positive comments for every negative one. “If people are given too much adverse comment, they may lose track of the parts of the agenda that they most need to address," she says.
D’Andrea says the observation must be systematic but you need to limit feedback to the person being observed. “It is a very intimidating process and it’s something that needs to be handled diplomatically.”
Orsmond argues that giving negative feedback is often unnecessary. If there is an issue of concern, start with what the person observed was trying to achieve.
But Walker-Gleaves says giving only positive feedback rarely serves any useful purpose. She says you should make clear that your comments are your own and be prepared to defend them.
Gosling says it is important to realise that there are benefits from the process for the observer as much as for the person observed. Realising this makes discussion after the observation more of a conversation, rather than putting the onus on the observer to make judgments.
He says that such a discussion will be frank only if it is confidential, but there may be points raised that it would be useful to put into the public domain. “We need to find ways of moving away from overemphasis on individual performance and think more about the departmental context,” he says.
• The Lecturer's Toolkit: A Practical Guide to Learning, Teaching and Assessment, by Sally Brown and Phil Race, Routledge Farmer, 2001.
• Reflecting on Reflective Practice within Peer Observation, Studies in Higher Education, by Linda Hammersley-Fletcher and Paul Orsmond, 2005
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Sign in now