Overvaluations ‘stifle’ university spin-offs

Dame Ann Dowling warns that universities that put too high a price on their intellectual property may hamper a spin-off’s success

August 7, 2014

Source: Deryck Chan

Some universities are overvaluing their intellectual property and may be preventing spin-off companies from making it big, according to a leading figure in engineering.

Dame Ann Dowling, who is set to become the next president of the Royal Academy of Engineering, said that institutions are stifling innovation by trying to keep hold of their original share in start-ups, which discourages others from putting in the funds needed to grow the businesses.

But an expert in the commercialisation of academic research said that it is the lack of venture capital that limits spin-off company growth, not “greedy universities”.

The issue came up when the RAE discussed innovation with its fellows ahead of a government consultation on science and innovation strategy, due to be published this autumn.

Dame Ann, professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Cambridge and head of its engineering department, told Times Higher Education: “Possibly universities overestimate the value of their intellectual property.”

Universities typically buy a share in the early stage of ventures that are spun off to exploit new ideas. But as the start-up gains investment, the university’s share gets diluted and ends up being very small, Dame Ann explained.

“Universities in some cases have been stifling that onward investment by demanding that they continue to hold…a large share of the spin-out companies,” said Dame Ann.

The UK should put more effort into building small spin-offs into sizeable companies, and staff at university technology transfer offices need more training on “how to maximise the pot for everyone”, she added.

But David Secher, patron and co-founder of PraxisUnico, a network that supports technology transfer, disagreed. “What limits spin-out companies has clearly been a lack of venture capital over the last few years, not greedy universities,” he said. “I do not think that universities are overvaluing,” he added, while noting that he could not “totally generalise”.

“This is a marketplace, and one enters a market with sellers overvaluing their goods and buyers undervaluing the same goods,” said Dr Secher.

holly.else@tsleducation.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Worried man wiping forehead
Two academics explain how to beat some of the typical anxieties associated with a doctoral degree

Felipe Fernández-Armesto takes issue with a claim that the EU has been playing the sovereignty card in Brexit negotiations

Man throwing axes

UCU attacks plans to cut 171 posts, but university denies Brexit 'the reason'

Kenny Dalglish

Agnes Bäker and Amanda Goodall have found that academics who are happiest at work have a head of department who is a distinguished researcher. How can such people be encouraged into management?

A group of flamingos and a Marabou stork

A right-wing philosopher in Texas tells John Gill how a minority of students can shut down debates and intimidate lecturers – and why he backs Trump