OECD report on skills marks down UK

The UK scores poorly in a major study by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development on adult literacy, numeracy and other key skills.

October 8, 2013

The OECD tested more than 150,000 people aged 16 to 65 in 24 countries for the study, entitledProgramme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (Piaac).

It is billed as having the potential to become an adult equivalent to the organisation’s influential Programme for International Student Assessment (Pisa) rankings, which measure the performance of school pupils.

The Piaac could have significant implications for universities, as it includes measurements of the skills performance of graduates in different nations.

Although the UK (meaning England and Northern Ireland in the OECD’s study) scored below average on literacy and numeracy, the study also measures whether people are using their skills in work – and there the UK fares much better.

Andreas Schleicher, OECD deputy director for education, told a press briefing in London yesterday that countries like the US and UK are “very good at extracting the maximum out of limited skills bases”.

Individuals “that are highly skilled get a lot out of this, those that are poorly skilled pay a high price”, he said.

However, Japan, which came top on both literacy and numeracy, is only “so so” at using its citizens’ skills, Mr Schleicher added.

For literacy and numeracy, the study produces a ranking based on the mean average of the percentage of 16 to 65 year olds scoring at each proficiency level.

In literacy, the UK was ranked 13th, ahead of Germany and the US in 15th and 16th respectively. But that was behind a top five of Japan, Finland, the Netherlands, Australia and Sweden.

In numeracy, the UK fared worse, in 16th place, although still outperforming the US in 21st place. The top five nations were Japan, Finland, Sweden, the Netherlands and Norway.

The study also finds that across all participating nations, adults with level 4 or 5 literacy (the highest levels) are three times as likely to enjoy high wages as those with level 1 literacy.

“Those with lower skills proficiency also tend to report poorer health, lower civic engagement and less trust,” the report says.

“What you know and what you do with what you know has a major impact on your life chances,” said Mr Schleicher.

john.morgan@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

Thanks for given us the straight facts. It's about time we saw learning as the way to reduce inequality instead of saying some people are just unlucky.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham