Mything, presumed lost

April 3, 1998

I have been concerned to read recommendations re the RAE that credit for research should be attached to the institution in which the research was done, and particularly that these recommendations have been put forward by the Association of University Teachers and Natfhe (THES, March 20).

Most research is done by contract researchers, a vulnerable and exploited group of employees. If they cannot take the credit for research that they have done with them when they (involuntarily) apply for new jobs, their position is weakened further.

The transfer market mainly applies to a small group of senior researchers. It takes little thought to realise that if they had had good employment conditions and remuneration in their original institutions, the transfer market would not exist.

Muriel Egerton. Middle Cottage, Tan Yard Brow, Manchester

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs

Head of Student Records

Bpp University

Business Relationship Manager

Edinburgh Napier University

Talent and OD Consultant

University Of The West Of Scotland

Senior Receptionist

Leeds Arts University

Pastoral Health Tutor Foundation Year

St Marys University, Twickenham