Minister asked to justify X-ray site

March 17, 2000

MPs are to demand that science minister Lord Sainsbury provides a detailed explanation of his controversial decision not to locate the new Pounds 550 million synchrotron project at Daresbury Laboratory in Warrington.

A member of the House of Commons science and technology committee said that if Lord Sainsbury's explanation was not satisfactory the committee would consider launching a full-scale inquiry into the matter.

The decision to locate the X-ray machine at Daresbury's rival, the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in Oxford, was greeted with anger and dismay by the Daresbury workforce.

They have consistently maintained that their laboratory's bid has been undermined by the Office of Science and Technology and the Wellcome Trust to ensure the project is sited in the south of England. The trust had threatened to pull out unless

the machine was located at RAL.

Campaigners at Daresbury, where 500 jobs are now at stake, plan to push for a public inquiry into the decision. Campaign leader Sue Smith said: "It cannot possibly be the model for public-private partnerships if a minority stakeholder, bearing only 16 per cent of the total project costs, wins the day simply by threatening to pull out if it does not get its way."

She said the government's regional policy was "in tatters", adding: "Labour voters in the party's 'heartlands' will not be impressed."

Lord Sainsbury attempted to soften the blow by announcing that a team headed by Bruce Smith, chairman of the Economic and Social Research Council, would carry out a study to identify ways of strengthening the Northwest's science base. Its recommendations will be implemented with at least Pounds 25 million from the science budget.

He said the Daresbury synchrotron source will be operational for seven years.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns