Medical charities seek lottery rethink

February 28, 1997

MEDICAL research charities want changes in the applications procedure for lottery grants to avoid a repeat of the low level of applications last year.

An Association of Medical Research Charities report out this week says that during the health and care disability grants round launched by the National Lottery Charities Board, the board sent out 3,300 research application packs but only 243 medical bids were finally made, a response rate of less than 10 per cent. Of the Pounds 160 million handed out during the round, only Pounds 6.2 million went to medical research.

The report says senior NLCB staff have suggested that the poor showing of medical research is because the AMRC made a "phoney fuss" that led researchers to believe that the board would not fund medical research. But the association "does not believe this to be true".

The relatively low sum awarded for medical research is partly the result of the NLCB's general restrictions for all applications, it says. Some charities were discouraged from applying if they did not have an existing research proposal that focused on the disadvantaged.

The AMRC adds that the board required applications to be for single projects and that this had the effect of limiting the total sum applied for.

The report calls for the board to remove the limit of single-project proposals and consider including wider research initiatives. The board should also move away from "themed rounds" by, for instance, the introduction of a rolling or annual programme of grant-giving for medical research, it says.

The NLCB welcomed the association's report, adding that it always sought views on allocations and procedures from the voluntary sector to complement its own evaluation of programmes.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns