Lib Dems back fees but still aspire to abolition

Amended policy accepts £9,000 charges in short term

September 19, 2013

Source: Alamy

Causing protest: many Lib Dem MPs broke pledge to oppose fee rises in 2010

The Liberal Democrats have reached a “credible position” by accepting £9,000 tuition charges in the short term and treating the abolition of fees as a future aspiration, according to the party’s deputy leader, Simon Hughes.

The Lib Dems, who again could be power brokers in any future coalition, reached a compromise over their official policy on higher education funding at the party’s autumn conference in Glasgow on 15  September.

Senior Lib Dem figures had originally proposed a motion that backed £9,000 fees and committed the party to “retaining the current system of higher education finance”.

But that was thrown out by delegates, who supported an amended motion.

The changed wording accepts that the £9,000 regime is “preferable” to Labour’s policy, adding that the Lib Dems will review the system after the 2015 general election and then scrap fees “if possible or necessary”.

Vince Cable, the business secretary, ended up backing the amended motion while disagreeing with the goal of abolishing fees.

“We and the other major parties are not going to go back to free tuition,” he told delegates. “Even if a party promised it, I don’t think the public would believe it.”

The Lib Dem leadership wanted to update the party’s official policy, which until now stated that it would phase out tuition charges – problematic given that many of the party’s MPs broke their pledge to oppose fee rises in 2010.

Mr Hughes, who took on the role of “access champion” in 2011, told Times Higher Education after the debate: “The party still has a strong anti-fees view.

“We are trying to be realistic: fees have been implemented. We’re saying that rather than try and go back to where we were [abolishing fees] immediately, let’s pause, reflect, take evidence, see the effect and then come back to it again in the round after the election. I think that’s a more credible position.”

Mr Hughes said that on access, it was “not the fees…but the funding for living costs that is the real issue”.

As a result of the vote, the Lib Dems are likely to have a short-term higher education funding policy close to that of the Conservatives at the next election.

Labour, which in 2011 unveiled a holding policy promising to lower fees to £6,000, must now weigh up whether maintaining a different stance will attract enough votes to balance the higher costs of implementing such a system.

Julian Huppert, the Lib Dem MP for Cambridge, who voted against £9,000 fees in 2010, told the conference that he wanted “an option to eliminate fees” kept for consideration by the party in the longer term.

But he added: “I really don’t think the public would believe us if we said it at the next election.”

The original motion proposing support for the £9,000 system was the fruit of a Lib Dem working group on post-16 education policy.

Baroness Brinton, who chaired the working group, criticised the party’s former policy to abolish fees. “We had no method for paying for it,” she told a Million+/National Union of Students fringe event at the conference on 15 September.

She added: “The group’s position was: we quite like the current system provided we get more support for students from lower-income backgrounds.”

john.morgan@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

United Nations peace keeper

Understanding the unwritten rules of graduate study is vital if you want to get the most from your PhD supervision, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

David Parkins Christmas illustration (22 December 2016)

A Dickensian tale, set in today’s university

Eleanor Shakespeare illustration (5 January 2017)

Fixing problems in the academic job market by reducing the number of PhDs would homogenise the sector, argues Tom Cutterham

poi, circus

Kate Riegle van West had to battle to bring her circus life and her academic life together

Houses of Parliament, Westminster, government

There really is no need for the Higher Education and Research Bill, says Anne Sheppard