A-level axe for creative writing prompts fury

Academics teaching the subject at university say it needs a place on school curricula as well

September 19, 2015
Man hit in face by paperwork
Source: Getty
Rip it up: subject introduced in 2013 will be discontinued, department says

Academics have expressed outrage at the government’s decision to axe A levels in creative writing.

In 2013, the Assessment and Qualifications Alliance examination board introduced an A level in the subject with much help from academics and creative writers.

Now, as part of the government’s plans to review all A levels, the Department for Education has announced that “it has not been possible to draft subject content in accordance with the department’s guidance and [the Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation’s] principles for reformed AS and A levels”.

In an explanatory letter to the AQA, the DfE stated that it had concluded that “there are connections between Creative Writing and English, and that Creative Writing is (or could be construed to be) more skills-based than knowledge-based”.

Many working in the field of English, at both school and university level, have been infuriated by this development.

Playwright and novelist Steve May, dean of the School of Humanities and Cultural Industries at Bath Spa University (where until recently he ran the country’s largest department in creative writing), noted that “the demand for creative writing courses in universities has grown exponentially over the past 10 years”.

If the A level had continued, he argued, “students would have been at a much higher level and ready for something more advanced”. At a time when the trend was “to use practicality to enhance employability” – and the requirement for creative writing students to think about markets and audiences often made them highly employable – he deplored the “outmoded idea of splitting off knowledge from skills”, which he saw as “going back to an [antiquated] Oxbridge ideal”.

For Jennifer Richards, professor of early modern literature and culture at Newcastle University (and chair of the English Association’s HE committee), “the key question is whether we understand the value of creativity and communications and whether they can only be taught at a certain age. Can’t we teach creativity and communications at schools as well as university? These seem to me to be vital skills whether you go on to further studies in the field or not.”

And Robert Eaglestone, professor of contemporary literature and thought at Royal Holloway, University of London, suggested that “the loss of this A level severely reduces the cultural and formal range of writing that students come to know and ends the opportunity for their own informed and rigorous creative responses.

Its loss will impede their understanding of and active engagement with our outstanding national creative industries and arts. And it throws aside the enthusiasm, commitment and choices of many students, teachers and academics,” he said.


You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments


Print headline: Creative writing axe prompts fury

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

John McEnroe arguing with umpire. Tennis

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman explain how to negotiate your annual performance and development review

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry