Lettori dealt a blow by Brescia court

The situation of the lettori - the British and other foreign lecturers working in Italian universities - has been dealt a blow by a new court ruling.

July 17, 2013

For decades, they have been pursuing compensation for income lost as the result of a 1980 law giving them annual contracts renewable for five years while Italian nationals were granted tenure.

But in January 2011, the so-called Gelmini law explicitly reinterpreted a 2001 decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and “extinguished” all the ongoing lawsuits.

This law - which David Petrie, chair of the Association of Foreign Lecturers in Italy, described as “a race law both in purpose and in effect” – was used by three universities to push through salary cuts of up to 60 per cent for some lettori earlier this year.

Furthermore, when three lettori were awarded compensation for unpaid wages in December 2011, the University of Brescia appealed citing the Gelmini law.This case came before the Brescia Court of Appeal on 11 July.

The court neither sought guidance from the CJEU on any discrepancies between national and community law nor looked again at the evidence but simply extinguished the earlier judgment. Campaigners fear this will set a precedent for other still unresolved cases.

“The court’s first responsibility was to follow the CJEU,” said Mr Petrie. “Our lawyer was stunned by decision and we are too.”

In a separate development, the issue of the lettori was raised by Andrew Brigden, MP for Northwest Leicestershire, in the House of Commons on 11 July.

In response, David Lidington, minister for Europe, condemned the “unacceptable and illegal” discrimination against the lecturers and said that the government was putting pressure on the Italian authorities to reconsider the matter.

Although this did not currently include plans to exclude Italy from the Erasmus and Bologna processes, he added that they would “continue to look at all available options to encourage a prompt resolution to the issue”.


You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Reader's comments (1)

After decades of proven discrimination it passes belief that Italy has still not suffered any consequences. Under threat of sanctions from the EU it passed a new law in 2004, only to effectively abrogate it with the Gelmini law a few years later. Is it really that easy to take the EU for a ride? Let's hope that the British government follows through and brings this disgraceful saga to a definitive end.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Forrest Post Doctoral Research Fellow

University Of Western Australia

Research Fellow in Statistical Epidemiology

London School Of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (lshtm)

Phone Advisor

Gsm London
See all jobs

Most Commented

Felipe Fernández-Armesto takes issue with a claim that the EU has been playing the sovereignty card in Brexit negotiations

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

John McEnroe arguing with umpire. Tennis

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman explain how to negotiate your annual performance and development review

Man throwing axes

UCU attacks plans to cut 171 posts, but university denies Brexit 'the reason'