Legal view: Blair unlikely to sue

November 7, 2003

Gill Philips, a solicitor for Times Newspapers and an expert on libel, said: "I find it somewhat hard to believe that those words are libellous.

"In the first instance, they strike me as amounting to vulgar abuse rather than anything else, which is not of itself actionable.

"In the second instance, the essence of libel is that you look at the overall 'sting' or meaning conveyed by the words... so, a successful defence would not be predicated on having to prove that Tony Blair was a '****'.

"Thirdly, it is certainly arguable (although it will depend on the context) that these words were comment, which would provide a defence so long it was an honestly held view.

"Finally, although predicting the response of a potential claimant is always a dangerous business, I would have thought it highly unlikely that Mr Blair... would think of suing over it."

Related story:
Leeds team in **** fracas

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs

Occupational Health Manager

University Of The West Of Scotland

Senior Veterinary Epidemiologist

Scotland's Rural College (sruc)

Architecture Manager

University Of Leeds

Research Associate

Kings College London