Languages needed for 'national security'

A British Academy report urges universities to help stem a decline in provision of languages with “strategic importance for defence and diplomacy”.

November 27, 2013

Lost for Words: The Need for Languages in UK Diplomacy and Security, launched at the House of Lords on 28 November, claims to offer the first systematic review of how “language capacity within the UK affects the government’s ability to maintain diplomatic relations and deliver national security and defence”.

Yet, at a time when international engagement was ever more important for the country, the “the fragility of provision for language learning within HEIs cannot be overestimated”, the report says.

Higher fees pose a particular threat in “the area of lesser-taught or minority languages”, including Turkish and Farsi, according to the report, given that “student demand is unlikely ever to reach levels that make provision economically self-sustaining. The gradual withdrawal of special factor funding over time has left some universities with no choice but to cross-subsidise these areas from block teaching grants, which will also end in 2013.”

An increasing reliance on philanthropy had also led to a situation where “the Chinese government now funds more Chinese language learning in the UK than the UK government, and this imbalance may give rise to potential strains on the neutrality/impartiality of the recipients”, the report says.

Speaking at the launch, Sir Ivor Roberts, president of Trinity College, Oxford, confirmed that “languages are under the cosh at universities as funding for teaching has been drastically cut, since they tend to be among the most expensive of the humanities. Even at Oxford, some of the smaller languages will go – and we won’t get them back.”

Others argued for making a certain level of language ability an entry requirement, but pointed out that the Office for Fair Access could constrain universities here.

In order to address the country’s dangerous lack of linguistic skills, the report highlights the need for “a cross-government strategy”. Universities, in particular, “should ensure they have the best structures in place to co-ordinate the allocation of resources to preserve at least a basic or minimum capacity in particularly threatened languages…links between [their] provision and the needs of government should be identified and strengthened”, the report recommends.

matthew.reisz@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

The seriousness of the Subject matter of this article is much greater than the article itself. I believe that there are insufficient details in the article's structure. Large chunks of quotation explain the subject, but provide little to debate. Thus, sadly (because of its importance) only three stars.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Doctoral study can seem like a 24-7 endeavour, but don't ignore these other opportunities, advise Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman

Matthew Brazier illustration (9 February 2017)

How do you defeat Nazis and liars? Focus on the people in earshot, says eminent Holocaust scholar Deborah Lipstadt

Laurel and Hardy sawing a plank of wood

Working with other academics can be tricky so follow some key rules, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Improvement, performance, rankings, success

Phil Baty sets out why the World University Rankings are here to stay – and why that's a good thing

Warwick vice-chancellor Stuart Croft on why his university reluctantly joined the ‘flawed’ teaching excellence framework