"I/A" item note: Adoption of a common position for a Regulation on transboundary movements of genetically modified organisms

February 24, 2003

Brussels, 21 Feb 2003

Full text of Document 62/03

1. The Commission submitted the above proposal to the Council on 18 February 2002. This proposal is based on Article 175(1) of the Treaty.

2. The European Parliament, in accordance with the procedure in Article 251 of the Treaty, delivered its Opinion at first reading on 24 September 2002. The Economic and Social Committee adopted its Opinion on 17 July 2002. The Committee of the Regions adopted its Opinion on 16 May 2002.

3. The Council reached agreement on the Articles and the Annexes at its meeting on 17 October 2002 and requested the Permanent Representatives Committee to establish the preamble and forward the text to the legal/linguistic experts for finalisation.

4. This having been done, it is suggested that the Permanent Representatives Committee invite Council, as an "A" item on the agenda of a forthcoming meeting, to:

- adopt its common position as contained in 15546/02 ENV 762 MI 301 WTO 179 ONU 86 AGRI 312 CODEC 1644 OC 5,
- take note of the statement of the Council's reasons in Addendum 1 to 15546/02 ,
- to enter in its minutes the statement as contained in Addendum 1 to this note.

The common position will be forwarded to the European Parliament as soon as possible, together with the statement of the Council's reasons.

* * *

Full text of Document 62/03
Statement to be entered in the Council minutes

"The German delegation's understanding of the 20th recital is as follows: The competent authorities are to apply the precautionary principle within the framework set by the Regulation's provisions. That is in line with the objective laid down in Article 1 of the Cartagena Protocol."

Council Register

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns