Frost and Sullivan Report is Confident of European Funding for Life Sciences

October 19, 2005

Brussels, 18 Oct 2005

An EU agenda that aims to create a knowledge based economy will give priority to life sciences, according to a new report.

The report issued by Frost & Sullivan, a global growth consulting company, acknowledges the importance of a more favourable climate for high-enabling technologies such comparative genomics and proteomics 'as they represent the strategic motor for furthering economic development in Europe'. In addition, 'budgetary increments along with supportive research policies will be a major driver in propelling life sciences research forward and help create a knowledge-based economy by 2010', says Frost & Sullivan healthcare analyst, Charanya Ramachandran.

The research study for the report focuses on three countries: the United Kingdom, France and Germany. Both the European Commission and the main public and private life sciences research institutes of these three countries have provided data for the analysis.

The total public life sciences funding in these countries for 2005 has been estimated at around 5.794 billion euro. The distribution of funding illustrates some differences between the three countries: while genomics, proteomics, and systems biology initiatives are the main priorities in the UK's current life sciences budget, the major volume of genomic funding in Germany is devoted to disease genomics. In France, most of the research is carried out by public research bodies in collaboration with universities and other institutes.

The document underlines a major trend in funding: the existence of cross-council programmes that serve as interfaces and, by fostering contributions from various public and private sources, add a new dimension to proteomics and post-genomics research. 'Major funding bodies, including the EC, have allotted adequate portions towards research intensive areas and governments are constantly working to enhance technical innovation and bring in more university-business collaborations,' notes Ms Ramachandran.

The report analyses the evolution of the average spending on life sciences (including fundamental research and application of genomics to combat diseases) and finds that, under the Sixth Framework Programme (FP6), it has increased from 7.61 billion euro in 2003, accounting for 67.4 per cent of the total European life sciences funding, to a figure accounting for about 73.1 per cent of total funding in 2005.

The analysis highlights the particular attention paid by the EU to initiatives aimed at increasing funding for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) as a means to foster knowledge transfer partnerships. According to the authors, this strategy could prove instrumental in the near future to boosting European global competitiveness in life sciences.

The report praises some specific aspects of FP6, such as the new instruments, pointing out that both the Integrated Projects and the Networks of Excellence can be used to implement many differentiated research areas. Integrated Projects aim at generating the knowledge required to address major needs in society, spanning the whole research spectrum from basic to applied research, and are set to increase EU skills in the global life sciences arena, according to the report.

This strategy is complemented by the Networks of Excellence, designed to strengthen scientific and technological excellence on a particular research topic through the durable integration of the research capacities of the participants.

In addressing the fragmentation in European life sciences research funding, the authors of the report see 'a clear strategy being devised towards incorporating a European Research Council (ERC)'. Some regional governments might resent this pan-European approach, warns the report, as it 'may bring in the need to adopt several complementary approaches and also result in projects being accorded a non-essential priority at the national level'.

The general perception of the ERC is positive however, and the participants in the study believe that it should be able to increase the efficiency of funding going into new fast-developing research areas, providing a new component of project funding exclusively based on non territorial pan-European competition.

Further information

CORDIS RTD-NEWS/© European Communities, 2001
Item source Previous Item Back to Titles Print Item

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns