English universities face ‘extreme challenge’ under next PM

Political shifts will bring funding shift from HE to FE, but universities could play into ‘politics of belonging’, former No 10 adviser says

July 18, 2019
Boris Johnson boxing
Source: Getty

English universities will soon be “challenged in extreme ways”, as Conservative politicians increasingly see the value in supporting technical and further education over higher education, according to a former No 10 adviser who now leads a centre-right thinktank.

Will Tanner, director of Onward, who was previously a policy adviser to Theresa May in the Home Office and in No 10, said that “every set of polling has shown that technical education is a vote winner”.

If, as expected, Boris Johnson becomes prime minister and “was to do one thing in education, I suspect it would be to redistribute or reorient education funding from universities to further education”, Mr Tanner told a Universities UK conference on 17 July.

There is growing discussion in Whitehall about the balance of spending on different parts of the country’s education system, he said.

“In focus groups, we hear time and time again parents who say they don’t want their children to go to university because it does not deliver value for money and young people who say their university education did not deliver the dream they were promised. That’s a profound change in the environment that the higher education system operates,” Mr Tanner continued. “After two decades of growing public interest and support for investment in higher education, the sector faces some pretty heavy headwinds.”

Polling suggests that what voters mostly want is a sense of belonging, community and security, he said – with support for liberal institutions, city dwelling and democracy falling. “We might see the balance starting to shift…with less choice and freedom in our education systems,” Mr Tanner added.

In recent years, the Conservative Party has become the party of apprenticeships, while the Labour Party is now the party of graduates, Mr Tanner continued, noting that levels of education were the core divide between Remain and Leave voters in the 2016 referendum. There is a political case for the Conservatives to build on that ground to try to win more support in Labour-held Leave-voting areas, he said.

When it comes to the Augar review of English post-18 education, published earlier this year, Mr Tanner predicted, “some aspects will be implemented and some won't”. For example, greater choice and better equivalence between higher, technical and further education, as well as the transferable lifelong learning allowance, would likely get support from the government, he suggested.

Reducing university tuition fees to £7,500 and supplementing the rest with publicly funded teaching grants was less likely to get through, he predicted. “From my conversations with Members of Parliament and even civil servants, there isn’t widespread support for marginally cutting them. However, there is government support for removing the in-study interest rate,” Mr Tanner said.

Universities will need to work to show their value, he said. “There is not a huge amount of sympathy for universities in terms of their funding settlement and government will to some extent want to take some money away and let the sector ‘sort itself out’....It will be up to the sector to respond to that,” he said.

However, Mr Tanner added that there is no reason why universities cannot forge relationships with industry to develop high-quality apprenticeships and technical qualifications.

“There is every opportunity for universities to become those bedrock institutions of local place and community, playing heavily into the politics of belonging,” he said.


Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (4)

That ‘Sense of Belonging’ was an ingrained part of the industrial society. But, it was a bottom up system developed through trade unionism. Apprenticeships were the norm when starting in industry, and the worker could depend on their local community with the support of their union via Labour clubs etc. This community ideal was wrecked by Thatcher’s rampant asset stripping and neo-liberal dogma. For the Tories to now suggest a top-down model of Industry led community building, is a joke. They will never be trusted in the former Industrial areas.
This onslaught against universities has been designed by Tories. They whack up university fees and interest rates on student loand to unaffordable levels, flood the media with all of these malignant studies about value for money and graduate outcomes and then plant spurious ideas in the public mind about mickey mouse and useless degrees versus virtuous apprenticeships. It's a culture war that belongs to the populist right and will continue to damage the UK H/E system, ironically one of the few things that we could call world class in the joke that is now Brexitland.
Apprenticeships with who....Deliveroo?
Those Universities that engage with and expand Apprenticeship Degrees, that bring together the two tribes, will survive and thrive. So will Universities that focus on and expand level 4 and 5 qualifications, including foundation degrees. These qualifications already span both the FE and HE sectors. Life has moved on and we should abandon the outdated, binary thinking of FE Colleges, where vocational training takes place and HE Universities where academic learning takes place. The vital middle ground where vocational skills training is delivered alongside mid to high level academic study already exists and is what should be adequately funded along with parity of funding to the students at both types of institution. There is also a place for institutions engaged with research and higher level academic education and higher level skills development but for a smaller number of people. What the country needs is more people with appropriate, high quality level 4 and 5 qualifications and skills and fewer with full level 6 and above University degrees. THe University sector has become too big and the number of degree options too great. There are too many students at Universities who lack the ability to study for and achieve level 6 degrees. Employers have, not surprisingly, become confused about the quality, suitability and ability of many graduates who all hold a piece of paper called a degree but are of widely differing competency and intelligence. We need new and better thinking, understanding, clarity and policy from all those involved in FE and HE.