Dutch election victor’s university attack has roots in PhD thesis

Thierry Baudet’s anti-immigration, anti-European Union party had its ‘cradle’ in Leiden thesis, former supervisor says

March 28, 2019
Thierry Baudet, who led the Forum for Democracy party.
Source: Alamy
Thierry Baudet, leader of the Forum for Democracy (FvD) party, is a former Leiden law lecturer

The academic who led an anti-European Union populist party to a shock election win in the Netherlands and used his victory speech to attack universities for undermining “civilisation” based his movement on his Leiden University PhD thesis.

The success of the anti-immigration Forum for Democracy (FvD), led by 36-year-old Thierry Baudet, a former Leiden law lecturer, offers further evidence of how the rise of right-wing populism across the West is heralding an era of culture wars over free speech and supposed left-liberal “bias” in universities.

Some also regard Mr Baudet – who styles himself as an intellectual and defender of high culture, with a love of the piano and a hatred of contemporary architecture – as to some extent reaching beyond the traditional base of such parties, which has tended to be overwhelmingly non-graduate voters.

The FvD won the most votes in provincial elections held on 20 March for the Senate, the upper and less significant house of the Dutch Parliament, depriving the governing coalition of its majority (although, with a multiplicity of parties competing in the Netherlands, the FvD only won about 14.5 per cent of the vote).

The party, founded by Mr Baudet as a thinktank before it became a political party in 2016, traces its origins to his doctoral thesis at Leiden, published as a book in 2012 under the title The Significance of Borders: Why Representative Government and the Rule of Law Require Nation States.

The FvD is connected to a number of figures in Leiden’s law faculty. Paul Cliteur, professor of jurisprudence at Leiden, was co-supervisor of Mr Baudet’s thesis and was placed second on the party’s list of election candidates – meaning that he is now expected to become a member of the Senate.

Speaking to Times Higher Education in his office at Leiden, Professor Cliteur said: “Basically his [Mr Baudet’s] PhD dissertation became the cradle of a new political movement. All his ideas, the ideas of the party, are in that particular book.”

“The key idea of the thesis and also of the party is that you cannot throw away the nation state,” continued Professor Cliteur, who, as a conservative legal scholar and columnist known for attacks on multiculturalism, is a controversial figure himself.

“The second thing is what is threatening that nation state. Two things: from above, the EU; and bottom up, multiculturalism.”

In his election night speech, Mr Baudet said that “we stand…amid the debris of what was once the largest and most beautiful civilisation the world has ever known. We are destroyed by the people who should protect us.” He went on to say: “We are undermined by our universities, by our journalists, by the people who receive our art grants and who design our buildings.” 

Asked what Mr Baudet meant, Professor Cliteur said: “Most universities do not honour diversity in the sense of ideological [diversity]…People interpret ‘diversity’ as difference in skin colour. But that is not what diversity is about. It should be viewpoint diversity.”

Ingrid van Engelshoven, the minister for education, culture and science, responded to Mr Baudet’s claim about universities, tweeting that it was “nasty”. The member of the centrist Democrats 66 party said: “Society is built on the work [and] knowledge of scientists [and] lecturers. We must protect academic freedom, not make it suspect.”

Later in the speech, Mr Baudet said that “people no longer believe in the Netherlands” or “in our language, which has…been abolished at our universities”. That was a reference to the long-running controversy over Dutch universities teaching some courses in English – a hot-button cultural identity issue for some on the right.

Asked why he thought that the FvD had achieved such success, Professor Cliteur said: “The people are looking for a new grand narrative, a cultural philosophy.”

john.morgan@timeshighereducation.com

POSTSCRIPT:

Print deadline: Dutch election victor’s university attack has origins in his PhD thesis

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Related articles

Claims that academics are indoctrinating their students with liberal propaganda are increasingly common in the right-wing media. John Morgan examines why such a conviction has arisen and whether there is any substance to it

21 February

Related universities

Reader's comments (1)

Research impact, anyone?

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October

Sponsored