Double firsts get windfall

February 28, 2003

Researchers who can demonstrate a decade of excellence will share the extra £20 million that the new 6* status will bring.

The board of the Higher Education Funding Council for England agreed this week to give the cash to departments that had gained the top 5* grade in both the 1996 and the 2001 research assessment exercises, known as "double firsts". The universities of Cambridge, Oxford, Birmingham, Manchester, Leeds and Sheffield each have at least three of these departments, as do University College, Imperial College and King's College, in London.

Funding for departments rated 5 will be restored to 2001-02 levels in real terms, reversing last year's 12 per cent cut, and funding for 5* departments will be maintained.

Some £18 million has been earmarked for departments rated 3a and 3b in seven "emerging" areas without a long tradition of research: nursing; other subjects allied to medicine; social work; art and design; communication, cultural and media studies; dance, drama and performing arts; and sports-related studies.

Overall, research will share more than £1 billion. The lion's share will go to departments rated 5* and 5. The rest will go to departments rated 4. It is not clear if this represents a cut for them.

Medical schools warned this week that any such cuts would be "disastrous".

Michael Powell, executive secretary of the Council of Heads of Medical Schools, said: "Medical schools would inevitably have to reduce staffing, and this would have major implications for clinical service and teaching."

Clinical academics are often on honorary contracts with the National Health Service, dividing their time between patients, teaching and research. Any funding cuts will have a knock-on effect on consultant numbers.

* Scotland fears it could be dragged into research classifications it does not support in the wake of the English white paper.

Tony Axon, research officer for the Association of University Teachers Scotland, said: "If (the 6* label) is introduced, the Scottish Higher Education Funding Council could be in the ludicrous position of having to use the 6* label for reasons of kudos and league-table positions despite there being little desire in Scotland for increased selectivity in research assessment."

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns